This was a very difficult question for me to answer, but I need to be honest. I need to try to find the answer to this question because I have been a bit of a saké addict since I was a teenager in the nineties. I will try to have some kind of answer for you that’s accurate and in-depth.
There’s actually no substitute for the saké in most cooking, and I’m sorry to say, it’s not an accurate substitute either. Sake is incredibly cheap, comes in many different varieties, and can be purchased in numerous colors. It can almost be a cheap alternative to wine because you don’t have to pay to get the wine. But to answer your question, it’s not a substitute for saké. It’s more of a seasoning, and that’s it.
Well, the reason I ask this is because I have some very serious problems with the saké substitutes. They taste so… fishy. The only thing that could make them taste fishy is if they were made out of fish, which I doubt. And the best thing about the saké substitutes is that they are cheap and good. But to me, the saké substitutes taste like fish. I just dont want to eat fish.
The saké-possessing people are getting some of the best food I’ve ever had. I would be really hard pressed to go outside a kitchen and eat fish. I’m a big chef and I don’t want to eat fish. So I’m not going to buy fish for my kids. But I’d like to make it a little more enjoyable.
Yes, I said fish. The problem is that even though the saké substitutes are so cheap, they taste like fish. It’s like they are made from something that tastes fishy. And that something is not fish. And there are a lot of people who love fish. But you know what they can’t do, they can’t make a fishy tasting fish substitute.
As it turns out, this is a problem for many people. The problem is that the substitutes are so cheap that, because they’re so cheap, they’re often indistinguishable from the real thing. For example, in Japan people use sake as a substitute for rice. But in America you can buy sake that tastes like fish. And it doesnt taste like anything.
But is it really that bad? The real thing is, that the Japanese use sake to make the fish substitute, but they use rice for the cooking, and therefore it tastes fish. It is the opposite of what we want. So if you want to make a fishy tasting fish substitute, you have to use something that tastes like fish. And what do you do? Try to make one that tastes like rice or something.
So we all know that the whole reason that sake was invented was so people wouldn’t have to drink it, right? But what happened when you used it for cooking or drinking? It tasted fishy. It was a bad choice. It didn’t taste like anything.
This is the main problem with sake, and its an even bigger problem with rice. Rice is very easy to make into something that tastes like fish. So it makes it pretty easy to make rice into something that tastes like fish without any care at all. The problem is that rice is all about texture, and that is in direct opposition to what we want from food.
It makes sense to me that we are talking about something that tastes like fish, but is instead a different kind of fish.